[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Labocania (was Re: ABELISAURIDS & CARCHARODONTOSAURIDS)
> > Secondly, Molnar was unsure of
> > _Labocania_'s affinities - the cranial elements resembled those of
> > _Chilantaisaurus_,
Nick Pharris wrote:
> Of course, we're none too sure of _Chilantaisaurus_'s affinities, either!
Very true. But I think we can be fairly sure that it isn't a
tyrannosaurid. Part of the problem is that there's very little
overlapping material between _C. maortuensis_ and _C. tashuikoensis_,
so they may not belong in the same genus.
> Nick Pharris
> Pacific Lutheran University
> Tacoma, WA 98447