[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Biggest predators
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com <Dinogeorge@aol.com>
To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 18. marec 1999 8:23
Subject: Re: Biggest predators
>In a message dated 3/18/99 0:59:42 AM EST, email@example.com
><< You are obviously referring to: Jenghizkhan
> Sorry, I didn't see the paper so I am just calling them all Tarbosaurus
> habit). I really do hope that the confusion with
> Tyrannosaurus -Tarbosaurus -Maleevosaurus genuses and species in Asia is
> resolved. >>
>Saw both Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus practically side-by-side at Los
>County Museum. There is >no way< the two are congeneric. They're on
>sides of the tyrannosaurine family tree.
I never saw them together to compare - but I agree - they must be different
genus - especially their skulls look quite different .
The eyes of Tyrannosaurs are more forward directed - obviously it had
better stereoscopic vision than Tarbosaurus.
Berislav Krzic (Kr?ic)
DINOSAUR ILLUSTRATED MAGAZINE
BERI'S DINOSAUR WORLD