[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: "Phylogenetic Definitions and Nomenclature..."

T. Mike Keesey wrote:
>Allosauridae == {Allosaurus > Sinraptor, Carcharodontosaurus,
>Cryolophosaurus, Monolophosaurus}
        Aaaaaah, multiple exclusive anchor taxa...

>Actually, his explicit definition is "all *allosauroids* closer to Ca. 
>than to either A., M., Cr., or S." (emphasis mine). By either definition
>of Allosauroidea, the "abelisaur hypothesis" renders Carcharodontosaurus a
>non-allosauroid. So would this turn Carcharodontosauridae into a null
        Yeah, this is an old objection of mine. Sereno seems to be following
an old taxonomic tradition. I believe Padian et al. discuss this in their
new paper. IMHO we can just ignore the "all allosauroids" crud.
     Jonathan R. Wagner, Dept. of Geosciences, TTU, Lubbock, TX 79409-1053
 "Only those whose life is short can truly believe that love is forever"-Lorien