[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 5/3/99 1:21:19 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< Doesn't removal of the
latter from Ornithopoda seem most likely to be right? >>
I believe you're indeed right, which is why I published exactly this
phylogeny in my article on Heterodontosauria for Gakken back in 1994:
Olshevsky, G., 1994. "The Origin and Evolution of the Heterodontosaurians,"
Kyoryugaku Saizensen [Dino-Frontline] 8: 74?97 [illustrations by T. L. Ford;
Check out the cladograms therein. There are, however, a few complications
that need to be dealt with.