[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


Despite considerable efforts, the tooth specimens originally described as
possible stegosaur teeth have not been relocated.  However, recent work in
the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar has resulted in similar tooth specimens,
and these have been a mystery to us, particularly since they seem to
differ from ornithischian teeth.  Then, last season, we found a skull (and
partial skeleton) with  some of these teeth in place, and it is decidedly
not an ornithischian.  At the risk of sounding like Tom Holtz, I'm afraid
that the actual identity of this beast will have to await formal
announcement in the not too distant future. Nonetheless, to the best of
our knowledge, there have not been any remains recovered from Madagascar
that can be placed securely within Ornithischia.

Scott Sampson


Scott D. Sampson, PhD
Department of Anatomy
New York College of Osteopathic Medicine
New York Institute of Technology
Old Westbury, New York
11568, USA

Phone:  (516) 686-3807
Fax:  (516) 686-3832 
E-mail: ssampson@iris.nyit.edu

On Fri, 7 May 1999 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 5/7/99 11:59:49 AM EST, darren.naish@port.ac.uk writes:
> << I believe Forster et al. in the recent Gondwana abstracts published 
>  in _Annals of the South African Museum_ stated that Madagascar has no 
>  known ornithischians: I cannot find this ref right now but can direct 
>  people to it in the dino-l archives. >>
> Stegosaurus madagascariensis is based on an ornithischian tooth that had once 
> been referred to Majungatholus, when that genus was considered a 
> pachycephalosaurian. Now that Majungatholus is known to be a theropod, the 
> tooth is no longer referable to that genus; but it still exists. It's 
> probably not referable to the genus Stegosaurus, but it might be 
> stegosaurian, ankylosaurian, or pachycephalosaurian (can't get to my paper on 
> it to check).