[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Two neat new ones for you:
Carrano, MT. 1999. What, if anything, is a cursor? Categories vs. continuua
for determining locomotor habit in mammals and dinosaurs. J Zool Lond
Another good one from Carrano, critiquing the over-simplification
and categorization of limb morphometrics as well as the inconsistent
application of the term "cursorial." One point will ruffle some feathers
(not mine): argues against theropod pursuit predation as a driving force
behind the evolution of non-theropod dinosaur locomotion. Read it and
judge for yourself.
And of related interest,
Christiansen, P. 1999. Scaling of mammalian long bones: small and large
mammals compared. J Zool Lond 247:333-348.
Another in a long string of mammal limb morphometrics studies; this
one (like Coombs 1978) is done by a dinosaur-interested researcher.
Critiques applying power functions in scaling studies of limb morphology
across Mammalia because it glosses over smaller-scale specializations
related to size and support. Standard comparisons w/models of geometric,
elastic, etc. scaling.
--John R. Hutchinson