[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Disney's Dinosaur Trailer
The flight of the (trailer) pterodactyl is similar to the flight of the
dragon in Dragonheart.
It 'looks' nice but it doesn't 'feel' right.
The flight of the dragon in Dragonslayer didn't 'look' as nice
(stylewise) as in Dragonheart but it 'felt' better.
The difference is that the dragon in Dragonslayer 'felt' as though it
had a LOT of mass it was moving through the air. The dragon in
Dragonheart could have easily been a balloon with very little mass
affecting it's movement at all.
We base our 'feelings' on this on what we've observed ourselves -birds
that big would have lots of mass.
Question is, would pterosaurs that big have as much mass as a bird that
big (my understanding is that pterosaurs would be lighter), and if
depicted accurately would us bird-biased people think it 'felt' right?
So next question is: which way do you do it?
(deep thought animator)
Samuel Barnett or Martin Barnett wrote:
> Dan writes:
> > what Walking with Dinosaurs could have been if they had had Disney's
> > budget. By the way, is THAT pterosaur flying correctly?
> Well MY gripe with the WWD pterosaurs was that they were using the sky as a
> backdrop to the animals, instead of using the air as it's means of
> transport. The trailer pterosaur is interacting with the air more, I'll
> grant you that (wings changing shape more frequently than WWD, angle of
> attack more believable, rate of vibration of membrane more frequent etc...).
> I won't get started on typical Disney melodramatic swoops, but for the most
> point it looks to me like an aerodynamically viable form of flight. Please
> note, I'm NOT saying pterosaurs really flew like this. If you ask me it
> looks far too much like a frigate bird's flight technique, but hey - if it
> works, do it!
Flying Goat Graphics
(Society of Vertebrate Paleontology member)