[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Giant birds
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/9/99 4:36:22 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
> << I guess I must be a bat, then, since patagia are modified forms of the
> webbing between my fingers. >>
> You might better think of bats as modified primates,
Well, Linnaeus did ( I think). And you might think of birds as modified
> since nobody has yet proposed that humans are secondarily flightless
Even you don't propose that ankylosaurs are secondarily flightless, just
secondarily terrestrial (right?). Humans *are* secondarily terrestrial.
> (though they're getting close...). Don't see how you got here
> from what I wrote, however.
You said ankylosaurs could be considered birds since scutes and feathers
are homologous. Bat wings and human finger webbing are homologous.
--T. Michael Keesey
firstname.lastname@example.org | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM: Ric Blayze | WORLDS: http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/