[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #118

At 08:24 AM 11/12/99 -0500, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
>No, it is not a macronarian, at least according to the paper.  It still
>falls out as the sister taxon to Neosauropoda.

I am finding myself confused by all the subclades of Sauropoda.

Could somebody send out a summary of all the clade definitions,
or a broad overview of the sauropod phylogeny with clade names?

May the peace of God be with you.         sarima@ix.netcom.com