[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: What is gen. indet. imperfectus?
In a message dated 11/21/99 10:56:16 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< I doubt this is what is meant by the cited text. I suspect it means
"imperfect material of indeterminate genus", and is not intended as a
*name* at all. In Latin adjectives often follow the noun modified (heck,
that is why the species name is second in scientific names). So, I think
you would do better to just read this as a bit of Latin text. >>
Unfortunately, I can't check my papers because they're buried in boxes right
now, but I think Rozhdestvensky is one person who interpreted this as an
actual species epithet and not an adjective, perhaps in the 1966 paper in
which he classified Sanpasaurus as a sauropod. In Tracy Ford's file I have
the following as the holotype of the species:
Holotype: IVPP V220
Locality: Locality 6, Kuantsaishan, near Houchiatsun, about 5 km NW of the
Weiyuan City, China.
Horizon: Kuangyuan Series, Middle Jurassic.
Material: An anterior caudal vertebra, a distal end of a left femur, a left
tibia, a right fibula, and right foot with a few elements missing.
(Locality data are as for Sanpasaurus yaoi.) I dimly recall seeing Young's
original paper on this, and it looked to me as if he were creating a species
named Gen indet. imperfectus in it. Would have to see the paper again to be