[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Millennium



No, what I meant was - S MilleNii is taken, however S MilleNNii is not.

----- Original Message -----
From: Timothy Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Millennium


> Samuel Barnett wrote:
>
> >Looking on the bright side (as it has been presented by the recent thread
> >"ICZN details"):  If this taxon proves to be a junior synonym of a
> >currently
> >known species, the name Sinornithosaurus Millennii is still up for grabs.
>
>
> Umm... no it isn't.  Once a name is used, it's preoccupied for eternity,
> regardless of whether somebody considers it a junior synonym or not.  I
> thought that's what the "ICZN thread" was all about.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>