[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: what's a "nomen vanum"?
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/15/99 3:19:58 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
> << what's a "nomen vanum"? I think this came across on the vert paleo list
> recently >>
> Literally the phrase means "empty name," and it denotes taxonomic names whose
> definitions are inadequate. It's no longer used (that is, it's not supposed
> to be used anymore); the preferred terms are now "nomen nudum," which denotes
> a name that has no scientific description, and "nomen dubium," which denotes
> a scientific name based on nondiagnostic material, or simply a scientific
> name of doubtful validity.
I thought a _nomen vanum_ was a name that had no designated type material
(hence "empty"), and that _nomina vana_ were leftovers from the ICZN's
more lenient days.
--T. Michael Keesey
firstname.lastname@example.org | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM: RicBlayze | WORLDS: http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/