[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


George Olshevsky writes:

<< Why is it that any fossil that doesn't fit the cladogram/theory of the day 
 called a chimera? Not to say Archaeoraptor is or isn't one, just that this 
 particular excuse is getting a little overworked (Protoavis, Avimimus, 
 Rahonavis, etc.). >>

Well.... for one thing, one of the femora looks to be at least 25% longer 
than the other, which is certainly odd in a supposedly articulated specimen.