[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 10/28/99 7:24:51 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< Was this [Cryptosaurus] renamed on the premise that it was too similar to
Dryptosaurus or was there another reason? >>
Here's the listing for Cryptosaurus from MM #2:
Genus: Cryptosaurus Seeley, 1869 [nomen dubium]
= Cryptodraco Lydekker, 1889 [nomen dubium]
= Crytodraco Delair, 1959 [sic]
C. eumerus Seeley, 1869?
= Cryptodraco eumerus (Seeley, 1869) Lydekker, 1889 [nomen dubium]?
NOTE: Lydekker (1889) considered the genus Cryptosaurus to be preoccupied by
an anonymous 1833 usage. Research by B. Creisler (pers. comm.), however,
indicates that this was a typographical error for the generic name
Cystosaurus Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1833 and not a proper prior usage of the
name Cryptosaurus. Therefore the name Cryptosaurus is reinstated for this
genus, and Cryptodraco Lydekker, 1889 is set aside as a junior objective