[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Bambiraptor feinbergi
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
>> As absurd as the fact of the publication of _Nessisteras
>> rhombopteryx_ was
>> (and in NATURE, no less), at *least* it was a proper sort of binomen.
>Although the binomen was properly formed, the lack of a type (or other!)
>specimen does pose a problem for the validity of the name...
This is true. Offhand, I can think of no other example where a set of grainy,
computer-enhanced, underwater photographs of dubious origin has been allowed
to serve as type specimens. But we digress . . .
Caitlin R. Kiernan