[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: a rose is a rose (Philidor's questions)

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, fredericus ruhe wrote:

> At 18:15 3-12-2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >There's always _Jurapteryx_ (the proposed genus for _A. bavarica_).
> No no, Jurapteryx was proposed for Archaeopteryx lithografica for the
> Eichstätt specimen by Howgate in 1984, Archaeopteryx bavarica was described
> as a new species by Wellnhofer in 1993. It is also known as the Solenhofer
> Aktien-Verein specimen.

Whoops; I must have gotten confused because I have _J. recurva_ listed as
a tentative synonym of _A. bavarica_ -- I think that must be an error,
though.... should be a synonym of _A. lithographica_, right?

 Home Page               <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
  The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    work, binary files      <mkeesey@dcentgroup.com>
     Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
      AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
       ICQ                     <77314901>
        Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>