[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: a rose is a rose (Philidor's questions)
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, fredericus ruhe wrote:
> At 18:15 3-12-2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >There's always _Jurapteryx_ (the proposed genus for _A. bavarica_).
> No no, Jurapteryx was proposed for Archaeopteryx lithografica for the
> Eichstätt specimen by Howgate in 1984, Archaeopteryx bavarica was described
> as a new species by Wellnhofer in 1993. It is also known as the Solenhofer
> Aktien-Verein specimen.
Whoops; I must have gotten confused because I have _J. recurva_ listed as
a tentative synonym of _A. bavarica_ -- I think that must be an error,
though.... should be a synonym of _A. lithographica_, right?
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <firstname.lastname@example.org> --> <email@example.com>
work, binary files <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>