[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Prehistoric Sharks
--- Mike Everhart <email@example.com> wrote:
> Any ideas why they
> jumped from the truly
> ancient sharks all the way across the Cretaceous to
> show Carcharodon
Isn't it _Carcharocles megalodon_ now? Or was it
placed back in _Carcharodon_?
> There are really a lot of well preserved
> late Cretaceous
> sharks from the Western Interior Seaway and
> elsewhere that deserve a bit
> of press now and then..........
I agree that _C. mantelli_ and its buds deserve more
press, but the rationale was probably as such: "let's
show the really ancient ones, you know, the 'first'
ones, then let's show the really freaking HUGE one
--it looked like the JAWS shark, you know."
That said, the evidence of consumption of a mosasaur
by a cretoxyrhina is just too interesting. A shame
not to discuss that, really.
Then again, I'm continually outraged that
_Camptosaurus_ doesn't get more media coverage ....
"Atheism: a non-prophet organization."
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.