[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #133

> Lewisuchus Romer, 1972*
> The asterisk denotes it as presently considered to be non-dinosaurian. Just 
> what kind of non-dinosaurian archosaur it is remains unclear, as far as I 
> know.
It may enjoy Dinosaur(iform) status once again. In the entry on
Dinosauromorpha in the Encyclopaedia of Dinosaurs, Arcucci suggests that
Lewisuchus might be a dinosauriform and might even be the senior synonym
of Pseudolagosuchus major. Apparently this is work in progress, I look
forward to the paper.


Adam Yates