[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: [Re: natatory Geochelone]
Ronald Orenstein <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> At 11:53 AM 02/07/2000 +0200, Juergen Peters wrote:
> > > In the case of the Galapagos tortise, this makes sense to me. Being
> > > blooded, these animals would not need to eat for a long period of time,
> > > and could therefor endure long ocean voyages.
> >But most probably they did not reach the Galapagos Islands by swimming,
> >as someone mentioned here, but as juveniles on drift-wood etc.
> Actually, according to tortoise experts I have talked to about this, there
is every chance that they DID get there by swimming. It seems that the
tortoises on the Indian Ocean islands at least (and I suspect the Galapagos is
a similar case) are not cases of insular gigantism but relicts of giant
tortoise populations on the mainland; if juveniles were the colonizers you
might expect some smaller tortoise species to be established there as well.
Well according to mtDNA sequence done on all the subspecies of _G.nigra_
(formerly _G.elephantopus_) along with a list of South American and African,
mainland tortoises, there closest living relative is the Chaco tortoise
(_G.chilensis_), which happens to be the smallest member of the genus.
So the initial trek to the Galapagos was probably done by a smaller tortoise,
like _G.chilensis_ and then later treks to different parts of the archipelego
probably were done by more elephantine individuals (and indeed mtDNA studies
seem to confirm this).
Abstract available online at:
Jurassosaurus's Reptipage: A page devoted to the study of the reptilia:
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1