[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Non-serpentine lacertids (was RE:WHAT'S GOING ON?)
At 02:20 AM 04/07/2000 -0700, Tracy Ford wrote:
Not really. When one "order" contains the single species of ostrich and
another "order" contains the majority of animalian species (Coeloptera),
you know something has to be wrong.
Why? If the category represents a degree of phylogenetic distinctiveness,
then it shouln't matter at all how many species it contains. There are
other reasons for objecting to "Order" as a category but this doesn't
strike me as one of them.
After all, by that criterion Insects should be split into many phyla, even
if the result would include groups with much lower levels of difference
than (say) Molluscs and Cycliophorans (the latter being an entire phylum
with one known member).
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org