[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: "Compelling" Paleocene dinosaurs



--- "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
wrote:

> In brief, Fassett et al. have found an isolated
> hadrosaurid femur in the Ojo
> Alamo Sandstone, stratigraphically above Paleocene
> pollen.  The suggest that
> the femur is not reworked do to pristine outer
> surface.

Does the preservation of the outer bone surface mean
it's possible that this was a dinosaur that lived,
what was it, eight million years after the k-t
boundary?  Is there any way that this is a Cretaceous
fossil that has shown up in a Paleocene deposit?

And what does this mean about the other fossils that
have shown up above the k-t bondary?  Does it require
a re-evaluation?


=====
Larry

"I've been ionized, but I'm OK now."

http://members.tripod.com/~megalania/index.html

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/