[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Diplodocid duck-and-cover techniques
horses have near 360 degree vision and don't need to turn around to see
what sort of field of vision would a diplodicus have anyways?
What keeps the diplodicus from smacking the tail into big trees and
rocks if it isn't looking where the tail is going? Wouldn't this
behavior lead to a VERY high probability of broken tails?
Patrick Norton wrote:
> >A tail that massive wouldn't necessarily need direction.<
> If your argument is that a swinging tail is an effective defense mechansim
> even if the animal couldn't see behind itself, then you have to agree that
> the tail would need to be in side to side motion >constantly< to be of any
> effect whatsoever. This seems to be not only a huge waste of energy, but a
> behavior that would easily be overcome by a predator.
> > I've seen horses blindly kick at whatever's behind them<
> If this is only a behaviour directed towards "whatever's behind them", then
> it's not so blind, is it? Horses don't go around kicking their hind legs all
> the time, do they?
Flying Goat Graphics
(Society of Vertebrate Paleontology member)