[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cryolophosaurus restoration

there was a early cryolophus restoration by Wm Stout that wqas published
on the cover of a(now extinct) Dinosaur Society newsletter.  I think he
may have even put it in with one of his Antartica portfolios.....for
what it's worth.  Wm. Stout has seen the fossil in person as well.

The crest thing is depicted like a spanish comb going ACROSS the head,
rather than along it.  Odd animal.

-Betty Cunningham

Steve Brusatte wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jun 2000 13:45:26
>  Timothy Williams wrote:
> >Steve Brusatte wrote:
> >
> >>In his 1994 and 1997 (and 1999, I believe) papers, Hammer stated that the
> >>some of the postcranial material may not belong to Cryolophosaurus.  As of
> >>today, he is basically saying that most of it (femur, vertebrae, ribs, hip
> >>bones) DOES belong to C. ellioti, but is leaving in the possibility of
> >>another Antarctic carnivore.
> >
> >In the original 1994 description, the authors (Hammer and Hickerson) do say
> >"it is possible these [postcranial] elements may not go with the skull, but
> >are clearly theropod and are the right size."  The femur and tibiotarsus
> >(which appears to be fused) are very ceratosaur-like, but the hip bones are
> >more in keeping with the tetanurine (especially allosauroid) affinities
> >suggested by the skull.
> Yes, Hammer also said that it would be "unlikely" for two predators the size 
> of Cryolophosaurus to be occupying the same environment, which would have 
> been the case if these postcranial elements do not go with the skull.
> The problem with Cryolophosaurus is that it's just too weird, even for 
> dinosaur and paleontology standards.  Nobody's quite sure what it is, mostly 
> because its odd mixture of characteristics and the fact that only one good 
> Early Jurassic large theropod is known from Gondwanna.
> In their 1994 paper Hammer and Hickerson presented three possibilities for 
> the evolutionary history and relationships of C. ellioti:
> 1) A ceratosaur with features convergent with those of some of the large 
> tetanurans
> 2) An early tetanuran that has some primitive features
> 3) Or, an early abelisaur
> Though, when I talked to him a few months ago he said that it was definitely 
> a tetanuran, which shares a few features with allosaurs but has a fairly 
> primitive postcranial skeleton.  Therefore, he said, he wouldn't place it in 
> the same family as Allosaurus.
> Plus, he said, the links between Cryolophosaurus and Allosaurus are fairly 
> unclear.
> So, I guess we're just as lost as when we started...
> Steve
> ---
> ***************************************************************
> SITE: http://www.geocities.com/stegob
> ONLINE CLUB: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/thedinolanddinosaurdigsite
> WEBRING: http://home.wanadoo.nl/dinodata.net/
> http://www.geocities.com/stegob/international.html
> ****************************************************************
> Send FREE Greetings for Father's Day--or any day!
> Click here: http://www.whowhere.lycos.com/redirects/fathers_day.rdct

Flying Goat Graphics
(Society of Vertebrate Paleontology member)