[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sharovipteryx II

>> Thus, we don't _need_ Liaoning
pterosaur fossils to tell us this <<
The "this" that I was referring to was whether _all_ pterosaurs had fur or just
some groups of them.  Your confusion is understandable as I could have made that
question clearer.

>> But we already _do_ have Liaoning pterosaurs: at least 2
pterodactyloid specimens.<<
Really?  Cool.

, but anyway, about Sharobipteryx. . .