[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"

--- MKIRKALDY@aol.com wrote:

> This week's Science issue is not yet on-line, but
> here is the Reuters take on _Longisquama insignis_.

> Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs-report 
> Reuters
> Jun 22 2000 3:34PM ET     
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The ancient fossil of a
> little tree-climbing reptile has a frill of feathers
> that casts doubt on theories that modern-day birds
> evolved from dinosaurs, scientists said Thursday.

I thought that the idea that animals like
_Longisquama_ gave rise to birds was a canard (pardon
the expression) given up long ago.  

How do these no-dino people explain the rather
striking similarity between bird skeletons and those
of certain small theropods?  Surely not in BCF terms?


"I've been ionized, but I'm OK now."


Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.