[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: replying to pomposity

In a message dated 6/20/00 9:13:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
kinman@hotmail.com writes:

>      As for Archosauriformes, it has in my opinion improperly been given 
>  suffix usually reserved for chordate orders.

Ah, but there is a subtle difference here.  Bird and fish ordinal names are 
formed by adding "-iformes" to a *genus* name [Salmoniformes = "things that 
are shaped like _Salmo_"; Falconiformes = "things that are shaped like 

Archosauriformes, Maniraptoriformes, etc., are formed from names of 
higher-level taxa.

Thus, if it is consistency you are striving for, you want Tyrannosauriformes 
or Apatosauriformes or some such, rather than "Saurischiformes", and rather 
than "Artiodactyliformes" you would want Boviformes or Traguliformes or 
Antilocapriformes, or a name based on whatever artiodactyl genus you consider 
most typical.

Nick P.