[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: a universal Reptilia (ending the cladisto-eclectic war)

Parataxonomy would be neither neutral nor the least bit informative. You may call it a "Cladisto-Eclectic System" if you like, but don't blame me if your tongue gets tired or tangled up. :-)
The full title of the book is more informative. The Kinman System: Toward A Stable Cladisto-Eclectic Classification of Organisms (Living and Extinct; 48 Phyla, 269 Classes, 1,719 Orders).
-----Ken Kinman
P.S. By the way, I used the term "semi-paraphyletic markers" in the book, and it was others who started calling them "Kinman markers", which is certainly easier to say.
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
To: kinman@hotmail.com, sarima@friesen.net
CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: a universal Reptilia (ending the cladisto-eclectic war)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:48:23 EDT

In a message dated 6/20/00 11:38:27 AM EST, kinman@hotmail.com writes:

<< The Kinman System is
designed to be a single universally acceptable classification methodology,
combining both genealogy and divergence "in a single classification in such
a way that both are retrievable." That is what David Hull said we needed,
in his 1979 paper ("The Limits of Cladism", Syst. Zool., 28:416-440). >>

You might try calling it something other than the Kinman System. Give it a
more neutral name, such as parataxonomy.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com