[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"
In a message dated 6/24/00 3:13:51 PM EST, email@example.com writes:
<< How can say the argument that "something is
abesent from the fossil record then it didn't ever exist is hogwash" in
support of BCF, but use that same argument against the existence of
bird-like Jurassic dromeosaurs proceeding Archaeopteryx? >>
Because we >do< have fossils of post-Archaeopteryx dromaeosaurs. The
collection bias is not nearly the same as for dino-birds.