[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

_Dilophosaurus breedorum_



T. Michael Keesey wrote:

> You're forgeting about the newly described D. breedorum.

Speaking of which, have a look at this new, somewhat jarring,
reconstruction of _D. wetherilli_ by Alessandro Marisa:
<http://dinosauricon.com/images/dilophosaurus-am.html>

Could this new _Dilophosaurus breedorum_ not represent a sexual difference in the _wetherilli_ species? Or are the two species from completely different ages and/or formations? There doesn't seem to be much on this topic in the archives.


- Jordan Mallon

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com