[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Sharovipteryx & Longisquama

Dinogeorge et al.,
I have no great problem moving Longisquamidae and Sharovipterygidae to Ornithodira (BTW, like Sereno, I prefer this name to Ornithosuchia, since it no longer contains Ornithosuchidae). However, I suspect that Cosesaurus may have to go along with them (since it is also part of "Protopterosauria"). Anything that would bar Cosesaurus from Ornithodira?
Could Longisquamidae be cladistically intermediate between Lagosuchidae and the earliest dinosaurs (such as Eoraptor)? Does Longisquama have a partially open acetabulum or other "near-dinosaur" characteristics? Seems to be more than one type of furcula, so am a little wary of that character. Any other putative dinosaurian synapomorphies in Longisquama?---elongate vomers(?), a relative long & distally projected deltopectoral crest on the humerus, shoulder joint facing backwards. grasping hand with inward-bending thumb, and so on?
Cheers, Ken Kinman
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Reply-To: Dinogeorge@aol.com
To: dbensen@gotnet.net, kinman@hotmail.com
CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Sharovipteryx
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 21:32:50 EDT

In a message dated 5/23/00 6:56:13 PM EST, dbensen@gotnet.net writes:

<< I don't have any really strong opinions about the matter either. The
prolacertiforms were a very diverse bunch (just compare Prolacerta to
Drepanosaurus) and they may well have given rise to such different creatures
as Sharovipteryx and Longuisquama. >>

Given the presence of a furcula and featherlike dermal structures, not to
mention a fairly theropodlike skull, it is surprising that there is so much
resistance to considering Longisquama to be a small theropodomorph.
>Anything< but (Heaven forbid!) that it should be a kind of small, arboreal
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com