[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Excuse me for using all capitals, but I think the point is that one
should not become *OVERLY* attached. You have to be somewhat attached to
effectively defend a position over time (and it often takes a long time).
But if you become so OVERLY attached that you lose your perspective, it's
going to eat you up in the long run.
The biggest example of this, Carl Woese's being OVERLY attached to the
idea of a highly thermophilic origin of life, has yet to play itself out.
But don't be surprised a few years down the line if both scientists and the
public turn on him. Three domain trees of life will look a little silly,
bacterial phylogenies will be properly rerooted, and "Archaea" will go back
to "Archaebacteria" or the more appropriate "Metabacteria". Woese's early
positive contributions will be largely forgotten, and his OVER attachment to
his other ideas will probably result in cruel Woese jokes.
His early attachment to the importance of rRNA sequence data was
justified (although he even overdid that somewhat), but in the long run he
will probably be remembered for tenaciously clinging to thermophilic origins
and badly misrooted trees of life, and ignoring evidence which called his
theories into question. If you pay attention to what happens to his
theories in the next several years, you will witness first hand what happens
when a prominent scientist gets OVERLY attached.
From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <Dinogeorge@aol.com>, <Chapman.Ralph@nmnh.si.edu>, <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: Origins (was: Re: Sharovipteryx)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 14:35:58 -0400
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> In a message dated 5/26/00 12:55:47 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> << *Try not to get overly attached to your own hypothesis!!; >>
> Would definitely not take this piece of advice. One MUST become
> attached to
> one's own hypotheses, otherwise one will not feel much urge to
> defend them.
And I would instead warn everyone (budding scientist, old professional,
person shopping for cars, etc.) TO take this advice. It is extremely,
extremely critical, although it is one of the hardest things to do in
To quote Sagan in full:
"Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.
It's only a way station in the pursuit of knowledge. Ask yourself why you
like the idea. Compare it fairly with the alternatives. See if you can
find reasons for rejecting it. If you don't, other's will."
To think of this another way, this is another manifestation of the
of "ideas by merit, not by source".
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-314-7843
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com