[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Yeah, the animal probably never exceeded 120', if that. Your idea of the
animal being approximately 108' is probably a correct length, knowing
the size of the verbrate(although we can't learn the maximum size of the
animal from only one skeleton). I think Gillette was going a little
overboard by stating that the animal reached a length of at least
150'(!!). Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks again Dave,
P.S. Do you have any addition new info on seismosaurus?