[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: OLD ORNITHOMIMOSAURS
Tim Williams wrote:
<The _Shuvosaurus_ skull might belong to the
postcranium named _Gojirasaurus_ (I think somebody may
have suggested this before, so it's not an original
idea of mine.) True, the _Shuvo_ skull is edentulous,
and a tooth was associated with the _Gojirasaurus_
specimen, but it's pounds to peanuts that the tooth
may belong to another animal (like the critter that
was munching on the carcass, a la Teratosauridae.)>
Carpenter (1997) and in-person on the list, has
reminded us that the holotype of *Gojirasaurus* has
teeth, which are distinctly coelophysoid in form and
are large enough to pertain to the holotype (a larger
form than *Coelophysis* and different from
*Dilophosaurus*) so thus ruling out the edentulous
*Shuvosaurus* (including associated premax without
teeth found near Gojira) as the skull for this form;
edentulous rauisuchians are known, so it is not too
far to see *Shuvosaurus* as being convergent or
applicable to the rauisuchid form.
Gosh, another "dinosaur?" might end up as a
rauisuchid. I can see a wonderful perspective paper on
"Rauisuchians and Convergent Evolution with Dinosaurs"....
Jaime "James" A. Headden
Dinosaurs are horrible, terrible creatures! Even the
fluffy ones, the snuggle-up-at-night-with ones. You think
they're fun and sweet, but watch out for that stray tail
spike! Down, gaston, down, boy! No, not on top of Momma!
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!