[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Stuff about Sue's proportions?

More than a walking torpedo,  a 'shark in stilts' with oversized head .... I 
had good replies from Jaime and Scott Hartman (who graciously sent me his own 
technical reconstruction of the skeleton).
For more details and as an addendum to Steve Brusatte's site fine photographs, 
the new  Japanese publication "Dino Press" has some excellent photographs of 
the Chicago mount . It is (I think)  available from :
The belly is not very far from the ground! The legs are short enough for almost 
any person to be actually capable of touching the head of T.rex without a lot 
of effort. Maybe is just the posture it was mounted.
Nevertheless, the streamlined, elegant profile is very evident and you can feel 
that, even if T. rex frame maybe wasn't precisely very flexible or 
manoeuvrable, when positioned the attack would be a swift deadly straight line.

"Henri Rönkkö" wrote:

>  Dear all
> First of all, I'd like to apologize I still use this mailing software which 
> doesn't insert breaks in the end of lines. If you'll view this from the 
> Archives, it won't be a pleasure. I'll try to switch my stuff in the near 
> future.
> But, to the main point. Some time ago I read with great interest a message by 
> Luis Rey, in which he pointed out that our view of T. Rex has changed; he 
> wrote that the skeletal reconstructions of Sue give reason to believe the 
> animal was somewhat overweigted, having a shortish tail and much mass in the 
> front (I think it was Jaime Headden who offered Rey a more avian gait as a 
> solution to the problem). Also, in Rey's eyes, T. Rex's posterior legs are 
> rather short. He wrote T. Rex nowdays looks a bit like a torpedo, and 
> criticized a National Geographic artist who drew his T. Rexes more 
> traditionally.
> Well, I son't think I have yet seen pictures of Sue's skeleton showing these 
> properties. Could you give me some references? I don't have access to any 
> special special literature, but at least the magazines Scientific American, 
> Nature, Science, Journal of Zoology, American Journal of Science, American 
> Naturalist, New Scientist and the ones available in the 'net are the ones I 
> have access to.
> Best wishes
> Henri Rönkkö
> ----
> Soittoäänet ja ikonit matkapuhelimeen!  http://www.iobox.fi/

Luis Rey

Visit my website on http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~luisrey