[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: LIONS & TIGERS REVISITED
In a message dated 9/26/00 6:16:54 AM EST, darren.naish@port.ac.uk writes:
<< Sorry, this is untrue - thanks to recently published reviews (see Turner
and Anton) their skulls can be reliably distinguished: in the postcrania
tigers are generally more robust.>>
I have no idea what "generally more robust" might mean here; a mature lion
would be "generally more robust" than a young tiger. It's interesting to hear
that they are after all distinguishable cranially, but I don't think this
undermines the import of my post. With sufficient study, it might be possible
to distinguish, say, four different species of tyrannosaurines from the Late
Maastrichtian of North America, but there is no incentive to do so when
everyone simply starts from the premise that it's a big tyrannosaurid from
North America, so it must be Tyrannosaurus rex, and then ascribes all the
observed variation among the known specimens to the usual three intraspecific
causes (individual, ontogenetic, sexual).
Since we cannot induce fossils to interbreed, we will, of course, never be
able to settle the question of what species there are in the fossil record.
Ordinarily, this would not be bothersome to me, but I've recently read
several articles in which it is categorically asserted that species diversity
has increasedon earth over time, and that modern species diversity is as
great as it has ever been in all of earth's history. Balderdash. There is
simply no basis for this kind of assertion whatsoever; the horribly
depauperate fossil record cannot be compared to the rich modern world in
species diversity.
<< Incidentally, most cat workers do not think that lions and tigers are
particularly closely related: lions are part of a 'spotted clade' that
includes jaguars and leopards - tigers are outside of this group. >>
So if they're not closely related (not that that matters to their skeletal
morphologies, which could be homoplastic rather than apomorphic), how come
they produce viable hybrids? Have viable hybrids been produced between other
species of these two groups?