[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: New member of the list/hadrosaurs



David Marjanovic wrote:
> 
> BTW I'm not sure that Austrosaurus can be confidently placed in
> > Titanosauria, Somphospondyli for sure, but maybe not Titanosauria.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Adam Yates
> 
> Some people have put it into Euhelopodidae, and Somphospondyli is most
> likely based on convergences, as euhelopodids seem to have become
> increasingly macronarian-like over time.

Wasn't this Rhoetosaurus? Or is Austrosaurus considered a relative?
(unlikely given the differences in the vertebrae)

-- 
____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon                   Australian Dinosaurs:
GIS Archaeologist           http://dannsdinosaurs.terrashare.com
Melbourne, Australia        http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj/
____________________________________________________________