[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: semilunate carpal
In a message dated 8/8/01 4:58:31 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< BCF seems to be presupposing that all "bird-like" characters are observed
in terrestrial theropods because they were passed on from birds to theropods.
The prevailing view, on the other hand, is that birds inherited most of their
defining characters from theropods, feathers included. The latter
interpretation has the advantage of having excellent corroboration from the
fossil record. BCF comes up a little short in this respect. >>
Leave us not talk about the fossil record when it comes to the ground-up
theory! ALL the most birdlike theropods appear in the fossil record AFTER
Archaeopteryx and cannot possibly be its ancestors. In BCF, this HAS to
happen, because the birdlike theropods >descended from< the dino-birds. The
fossil record, taken at face value, DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS ground-up/BADD. The
cladistics requires EVERY KNOWN theropod to have a substantial ghost lineage
to the point of its divergence from the dinosaur-to-birds lineage. And >I'm<
the one accused of making up fairy-tale dino-birds? Where are the Triassic
and Jurassic maniraptoran, Deinonychus-like theropods, if they were ancestral
to Archaeopteryx-like birds? Not only is Archaeopteryx an advanced
maniraptoran, it is also the EARLIEST ONE known, save perhaps for a few
small, nondescript teeth of about the same age. FEH. Fossil record indeed.
Hey, am I getting close to my seven-email quota? Yike--this one right here is
#7 for August 8, according to my Sent Mail file. See you all tomorrow.