[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Mickey Mortimer wrote:
I'm being very picky here, but....
> A node-based definition is-
> "all descendents of the most recent common ancestor of A and B"
I prefer, "The most recent common ancestor of A and B [and C, etc.], plus
all of its descendants." The above formulation does not include the
ancestor of the group, a vital component in order for the taxon to be a
> Basically, anything in the smallest clade containing both A and B.
That is another good way to put it.
> A stem-based definition is-
> "all taxa more closely related to A than to B"
This formulation I really dislike, since people use "closely related" in
A better one would be, "The earliest ancestor of A which is not also an
ancestor of B [and C, etc.], plus all of its descendants."
Or, "The most inclusive (largest) clade containing A, but not B [or C,
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>