[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: birds and avians again
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Jaime A. Headden wrote:
> I beleive both Chelonia and Crocodylia use fossil
> specifiers/anchors, but I cannot recall them off the top of my head.
No, I think they are crown groups. And actually, since _Chelonia_ is also
a genus, I think _Testudinata_ or _Testudines_ would be a preferable name
for the larger clade.
> Tetrapoda as well.
This was once defined as a crown group, but I think that proved unpopular
(much like for _Aves_). I'm not sure what the preferred definition is, but
it might be something like Clade(_Elginerpeton_ + _Homo_) or Clade(_Homo_
<-- _Panderichthys_, _Elpistostega_).
> Amniota is a stem excluding lissamphibians,
I think it's a crown group, _Amniotomorpha_ being the stem.
> and Synapsida is a stem from Sauropsida, or conventionally, Reptilia.
> Reptilia is a crown group clade comprising Chelonia, Lepidosauria
> [incl. snakes and mosasaurs], Crocodylia, and Dinosauria [incl.
> birds]. That these groups are already viable and the vernacular
> applies to them easily,
I would disagree in the case of _Reptilia_, a name that I really wish had
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <email@example.com> --> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>