[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Scientific American book
> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:33:44 -0800
> From: Richard Peirce <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Now that I have finished reading the The Scientific American
> Book of Dinosaurs I would like to share my reflections on it for the
> benefit of any Listers who are still wondering whether it is worth
> their while to part with $35.
I'll stick my oar here too, if I may.
I've read about 2/3 of this book so far, and I have to say it's
disappointing. My problems with it are mostly the ame as Richard's,
but I think they bother me more than they do him :-)
1. How is it possible for this book to be published sans index?
2. The restorations sprinkled through the articles are indeed
beautiful and evocative, but I would _so_ much rather have had
useful diagrams than tangentially related Art.
3. The actual writing is patchy in places: there's some clumsy
English and a lot of misprints.
4. The skeletal reconstructions are minuscule. Others have said
this, but I would gladly pay a reasonable price for a book
consisting only of these and similar illustrations blown up to
a sensible size.
It's still fascinating; and it does have the advantage of being very
up to date. But for other interested laymen like myself who don't
already own it, I would have to recommend _The Complete Dinosaur_,
edited by James O. Farlow and M. K. Brett-Surman, ISBN 0253213134.
For pretty much the same price ($28.00 vs. $26.36 for the SciAm book
at amazon.com) it's about twice as long, written in a much more
detailed way, is better illustrated (in terms of diagrams rather than
restorations) and feels more of a unity rather than an anthology,
including material not covered in SciAm, such as Holtz's very usefu
overview of the dinosaur skeleton.
To clarify: this is not to speak against the SciAm book -- I am very
glad to have bought it. But for anyone who's going to buy just one
dinosaur book, I'd have to recommend TCD ahead of it.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor -- <email@example.com> -- http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/
)_v__/\ Now what?
P.S. Apologies to any HPs who contributed to the SciAm book -- I'm
sure you're all aware that this is nothing personal!