[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?
Way way back many moons ago, Pete Buchholz wrote..
> ornithopods specifically were by far NOT boring dinosaurs. That
> distinction is placed squarely on basal coelurosaurs, by far the most
> boring of all dinosaurs... or perhaps ducks, they're kinda boring too.
Errm... the evolution of carpal spurs and knobs, extreme pugnacity and
territoriality, nest parasitism, creching behaviour, parental carrying of
young both in the water and (!) in the air, monogamous pair-bonding,
underwater copulation and the (?)reinvention of the penis, major
sexual variation in tracheal structure, grass-eating and 20-minute gut
carrying time, niche partitioning according to intestine size, carrion
feeding on Subantarctic islands, the evolution of fern-eating, island
giantism, island dwarfism, crepuscularity, serrated bill margins, filter
feeding with buccal lamellae, deep-diving, species where males are
flightless but females flighted, coevolution of browsing forms with
spiky lobelioideaens, repeated increases and decreases in body size
during phylogeny, the annual transportation of TONNES of sand... and,
pant pant pant, quacking.
How *ON EARTH* can ducks be boring?????
"All jungles were their jungles, and not a single animal stood before
them" - - - Kipling
PALAEOBIOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP
School of Earth, Environmental & Physical Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH
Burnaby Road email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Portsmouth UK tel (mobile): 0776 1372651
P01 3QL tel (office): 023 92842244
tel (home): 023 80446718