[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


I'm sorry, but I feel a very hostile envirement against Feduccia. I am not
the one to defend him, but you can't critizise someone who wrote something
in 1996,  and blame him for it when new evidence appears in 1998.

Peter F. Murray & Dirk Megirian, 1998.
The Skull of Dromornithid Birds: Anatomical Evidence for Their Relationship
to Anseriformes 
Records of the South Australian Museum 31: 51-97

Fred Ruhe

At 12:22 22-02-2001 +0100, you wrote:
>> > I miss something here... the mihirung (Dromornithidae), giant
>> > flightless birds of Eocene -- Pleistocene Australia, which were just
>> > found out to be _carnivorous ducks_, with enormous beaks much
>> > like *Gastornis* ("*Diatryma*")
>> My text was only about ducks. Dromornithids might be anseriforms
>> but, AFAIK, there is no evidence that they are actually members of
>> the Anatidae. Similarly, nobody (to my knowledge) has proposed that
>> gastornithids are anatids [note: there's stuff in the archives about a
>> possible gastornithid-anhimind link].
>Oh, yeah, true, dromornithids are anseriforms, but not anatids -- I have
>wrongly remembered the anseriform cladogram in -- mercy -- Feduccia's 1996
>book which I thought showed ducks spread all over it. There have been
>proposals that gastornithids are anseriforms instead of "gruiforms"; while I
>can't comment on that, I've found a ref for anseriform dromornithids
>somewhere on the web :-] (Yahoo search for Dromornithidae). However, at
>least *Bullockornis* has been called "The Demon Duck of Doom" (forgot the
>ref for that; New Scientist?)
>        I'll read the archives anyway. Just arrived at May 1994 :-)
>> On the duck poem thing, David Marjanovik wrote..
>Marjanovic, with an acute on the c which I can cut & paste into HTML mails,
>but most e-mail readers can't read it... pronounced between ts and ch. :-)