[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: A little off subject...Re: Sue had no wishbone...
In a message dated 2/25/01 3:25:22 PM EST, MKIRKALDY@aol.com writes:
<< Anyone can self-publish, give lectures, and issue press releases. Whether
not what they are saying is scientifically meaningful goes back to peer
No, peer review is no criterion for deciding whether something that someone
is saying is scientifically meaningful. The criterion for deciding whether
someone is saying something scientifically meaningful is nothing more nor
less than whether he or she >is< saying something scientifically meaningful.
Peer review may sometimes be helpful is getting your work accepted, but this
is not the same thing as producing scientifically meaningful work.