[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: A little off subject...Re: Sue had no wishbone...
In a message dated 2/25/01 4:30:05 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< Well, this seems a bit circular, because the criterion you're using to
evaluate "scientifically meaningful" is also your definition. In other
words, we know it because we know it. >>
Yes, and >deliberately< circular to boot! "Scientific meaning" is in the eye
of the beholder. I'm well aware of the usual reasons given for desiring peer
review, and I don't think they hold water.
[The numerous &#nbsp; tags (two of which occur in the above), lamentably,
make your post difficult to read and reply to. Any way you can repost with