[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Scaly tyrannosaurs; fact or fiction?
Ken Kinman wrote-
> But if I recall correctly, Tom Holtz (at least in an analysis earlier
> in 2000) found Compsognathids to be cladistically intermediate between
> Tyrannosaurs and Maniraptors.
> When you say your analysis places tyrannosaurs just "below"
> compsognathids, I assume you mean the tyrannosaurs are cladistically
> intermediate between compsognathids and maniraptors. Right?
Yes, you're correct. I forgot about that one. However, unlike the
phylogenies I mentioned, Holtz had compsognathids as maniraptorans, above
ornithomimids as well. This is also possible in my analyses, as the "basal
coelurosaurs" (compsognathids, Coelurus, Ornitholestes, Scipionyx,
Nqwebasaurus, Nedcolbertia, etc.) have a chaotic placement and will
sometimes be maniraptoriform sister groups and other times basal
maniraptorans. My current analysis only supports Nqwebasaurus as being a
basal maniraptoran, but I'm sure the next will show something different.
You probably got your last paragraph messed up. What I meant to say was
that in the phylogenies I mentioned, the topology was as follows-
(Tyrannosauria (Compsognathus + Maniraptoriformes)) .