[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Oviraptor Palatines
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Oviraptor Palatines
Rob Gay wrote-
> So, would secondarily flightless oviraptors eliminate this "convergence"?
Remember "secondarily flightless" doesn't equate to "closer to birds than
Archaeopteryx", so no change in current phylogeny is needed to make
oviraptorids secondarily flightless.
Hows this for speculation. Maybe some theropods weren't secondarily
flightless from the bird line, but were secondarily flightless from a
theropods that could fly? What if Rahonavis isn't a bird, but a flying
dromaeosaurid? Which would mean flight evolved several times.