[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

David's paper

I haven't had a chance to carefully read (much less digest) your post, but will make a few comments just to get a discussion going.
The topology of your tree seems to indicate that you believe that the "separate exit for cranial nerve V1" only evolved once. I know nothing about this character, but just to play devil's advocate, I wonder how likely it would be that this separate exit developed at least twice. Has anyone discussed this in the literature?
The parts on feather evolution look very interesting to me, but not enough time to digest it today. However, I would agree that your tree topology is another example of how phylogenetic taxonomy can run into very serious difficulties. It would certainly complicate what groups belong to a cladistically-defined Aves (at least those anchored on Archaeopteryx). And having a Eumaniraptora more inclusive than Maniraptora is also troubling (as you pointed out), so if you maintain this tree topology, I definitely would scrap the name Eumaniraptora. I am tempted to throw in some comments about PhyloCode, but I will bite my tongue and end this post here.
------Cheers, Ken
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com