[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Invalid names (was RE: Physiological Adaptations of the Dinosauria (long))
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Invalid names (was RE: Physiological Adaptations of the
In a message dated 1/29/01 12:18:06 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
<< the author has not (to anyone's knoweldge) ever studied the matierial in
I'm pretty sure he has. But that doesn't make much difference in this
situation, I think.
>From the gist that I get from him, he is using the long dead Powell, Welles
paper and 'fixing' it up. Years ago I talked to a student that was working
with Powell and she told me that he dropped the monograph, mainly because he
was s splitter and Welles is a lumper (or was it the other way around?).