[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re:"Subequal"



Jaime Headden wrote:
 
 <<Dear List,

  Due to a slight disagreement, friend and I are curious as to
the technical definition and/or usage of the term "subequal.">>
 
I'd say, given a length _l_ (to which we refer), something like      (l-x)=<l<=(l+x)
 
I'm sorry but I don't know how to use the proper characters(with outlook); however I think it's clear enough