[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: [Re: Bird and dinosaur respiration]
"David Marjanovic" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > That's well said.
> > But where to put in _Scipionyx_ with its diaphragm?
> - Birds have a diaphragm somewhere. (Ref must be somewhere in
> www.dinosauria.com, can't find it now.) They just don't use it for
> respiration, AFAIK, and the abdominal air-sacs are located caudally of it.
> - Are you alluding to the hepatic piston system Ruben et al. assume? >
Their _*ONLY*_ evidence for this, IIRC, is the "dome-shaped" outline of > the
liver -- well, the specimen is a 2-dimensional fossil; making > claims
based on the shape of organs that are flatter than in a > roadkill is,
IMHO, rather unscientific.
Actually they did have another, more solid (IMHO) piece of evidence, and that
was the lack of room in the specimen for posterior-dorsal (can't remember the
exact term) air sacs.
I have heard numerous retorts to the liver evidence, but no one ever talks
about the, apparent fact, that _Scipionyx_ didn't have room for air sacs in
its hind quarters.
> - As someone has mentioned onlist, there is evidence against a croc-style
> diaphragm in *Scipionyx* -- its gut isn't limited to any part of the
> abdominal cavity. This can be affected by preservation, too, of course,
> unless the specimen has been compressed laterally enough.
> - This is older than the discovery of *Scipionyx*, but see for yourself
> older thread: http://www.dinosauria.com/jdp/misc/lungs.html -- if
> *Scipionyx* really would have had a hepatic piston system this would have
> be an autapomorphy.
The Reptipage: A site devoted to the study of and education on, the reptilia: